| New York (State). Court of Chancery, William Johnson - Equity - 1837 - 548 pages
...jurisdiction. Here is a bill for partition, and pending the suit it appears to be extremely fit that the tenant in common in possession, should not be permitted to strip the land of its timber. It is destructive, in many cases, of the value of the estate, and not consistent with a prudent enjoyment... | |
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery, George Blight Halstead - Equity - 1849 - 724 pages
...insolvent, or where the waste was destructive to the estate, and not within the usual and legitimate exercise of enjoyment ; and that he thought it fit...WARNE v. The MORRIS CANAL AND BANKING COMPANY. In 1839, the owner of a mill seat leased to a canal company, for throe years, at an annual rent, the privilege... | |
| Robert Henley Eden Baron Henley - Forms (Law) - 1852 - 770 pages
...jurisdiction. Here is a bill for partition, and pending the suit, it appears to be extremely fit that the tenant in common in possession should not be permitted to strip the land of its timber. It is destructive in many cases of the value of the estate, and not consistent with a prudent enjoyment... | |
| Boyd Crumrine - Law reports, digests, etc - 1872 - 636 pages
...answer, they are admitted tenants in common and " pending the suit, it appear? extremely fit, that the tenant in common in possession should not be permitted to strip the land of its timber." The peculiar value of the land in controversy is the timber, and if between this date and the final... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 1160 pages
...very land was pending, and he remarks that, "pending the suit, it appears to be extremely fit that the tenant in common In possession should not be permitted to strip the land of its timber." In that case counsel had cited Goodwyn v. Spray, Dickens, 677, decided In 1786, and Smallman v. Onions,... | |
| Zechariah Chafee - Equitable remedies - 1924 - 544 pages
...jurisdiction. Here is a bill for partition, and pending the suit it appears to be extremely fit that the tenant in common in possession should not be permitted to strip the land of its timber. IF is destructive, in many cases, of the value of the estate, and not consistent with a prudent enjoyment... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 1266 pages
...very land was pending, aud he remarks that, "pending the suit, it appears to be extremely fit that the tenant in common in possession should not be permitted to strip the laud of Its timber." In that case counsel had cited Goodwyn v. Spray, Dickens, 677, decided in 1786,... | |
| |