Page images
PDF
EPUB

public works, which were now of any importance, had been carried on and completed by means of the speculations of individuals and private bodies. There were, however, to this general principle, exceptions founded upon special circumstances, where the aid and interposition of government might be of effectual service, both with respect to the assistance actually afforded, and to the spirit excited by it, with a view to the furtherance of the objects sought to be carried into effect. It was upon the ground of special circum stances of this nature that pecuniary aid was afforded by government to the commercial body in 1793 and 1811, and which assistance was productive of the greatest advantage. The present bill was also founded upon special circumstances, which, though not altogether the same as those existing in 1793 and 1811, were nearly similar, the main object being to relieve the difficulties arising from a diminution of the circulating medium, and a deficiency of credit, by advancing money to carry on public works, and thereby giving employment to a number of the labouring poor, who could not otherwise obtain it. The two objects of the bill were, to advance money for the carrying on of public works, and also to parishes with a view to relieve the pressure of the poor-rates. With regard to the latter, he did not anticipate that there would be many calls for money, but if it should afford a relief in only a few instances, still the enact ment would be of considerable service. With regard to public works, he conceived that an advance of money for the purpose of commencing or carrying on works of public utility, would be, under the pressure of present circumstances, most beneficial in its consequences, by giving employment to a number of persons, for whose labour there was at this time no demand. The difficulties which existed had arisen from a combination of circumstances which peculiarly called for the special interposition of parliament. The depreciation of landed property, compared with its value for the last few years, had, in the first instance, created considerable embarrassment; but this evil, he believed, was now beginning to diminish, by the increasing value of that description of property. The depression of the manufacturing interest, another great evil, was to be attributed to the over-trade carried on for some years with the continent, and the consequent diminution of the demand (VOL. XXXVI.)

for our manufactures, which had necessarily thrown a number of persons out of employment, and lessened the demand for labour. Added to this was the effects of the late bad harvest, which, immediately increasing the price of provisions, at a period when the demand for labour had greatly diminished, unavoidably increased the pressure; but which also, by its operation on the continent, tended materially to increase the pressure upon the manufacturing interest. On the continent, with respect to the distress arising from the scarcity of food, the people were much worse off than in this country; and he had himself received accounts that day from Germany and France, respecting this subject, which were quite appalling. It of course followed, that provisions being raised on the continent to four times their former price, the incomes of a great number of persons were wholly employed in procuring subsistence, and they had no surplus whatever to lay out in articles of manufacture. This necessarily increased the pressure upon the manufacturing interest here, and precluded a demand for labour. It was under these special circumstances of pressure and difficulty, that he proposed to their lordships to agree to the present bill; and though, undoubtedly, time was the only effectual remedy, under the operation of which the pressure and difficulty would gradually cease, still this measure, as a temporary relief, would, he conceived, be of essential service.

The Earl of Lauderdale was glad to hear the noble lord advocate the general principle, that it was unwise in govern. ment to interfere in affording aid for the carrying on of public works which were best conducted by individuals as a speculation with a view to their own profit. He could not, however, see, that in the argument with regard to the exception, any good ground was laid for the present measure. The noble lord had himself admitted, that with respect to the proposed advances of money to parishes, the bill would be of no use; why, then, insert these clauses at all? The only effect would be to increase discontent. A gene. ral idea had gone forth, that this bill was to operate as a sort of general parochial relief, and what must necessarily be the effect of the disappointment but increased discontent? The measure was altogether one which it would be much better not to pass; and when he saw that after three (3.0)

months deliberation upon circumstances known at the commencement of the session, the only result was the present bill, under which money borrowed at 2 per cent. was to be lent at 5 per cent. thereby obtaining an usurious interest, he could not help thinking the bill little calculated. to make any favourable impression upon the public mind. The noble lord had maintained that the difficulties of the present period, with regard to the state of our manufactures, had arisen merely from a transition from war to peace, but this was by no means a true view of the question. The real facts were, that by means of the enormously increased expenditure of the country during a period of twenty years, there had been a greatly increased demand for our manufactures, and consequently a continually increasing demand for labour, by which population was naturally increased. The necessary consequence of a decrease in the public expenditure was, a diminished demand for manufactures and a diminished demand for labour with an increased population. How was it possible to find employment for the surplus labour for which there was thus no demand? The noble lord proposed a partial relief by giving employment to a certain portion of labour, but this would only aggravate the evil. The money advanced was to be repaid at the end of two years, and then there would only be an increase of the evil in the accumulation of unemployed labour. Thus there would be in point of fact, no remedy for the evil, whilst another evil of no small moment would be created.

The money was to be advanced upon the security of individuals, but in such a way and with such means of recovering it by immediate process of law, that persons might well hesitate to become security under such circumstances; and what was the consequence? that the higher classes were unjustly held up as objects of detestation to the lower ranks, already too prone to make attacks upon persons of property. What, besides, would be the effect of the advances for carrying on public works with regard to the employment of the poor in the neighbourhoods of those works; persons having to carry on works with a view to profit, would of course employ the best workmen at the cheapest rate; they would seek for them wherever they were to be found, and bring them to the spot, without any regard whatever to the poor of the immediate neighbourhood. Under all

these circumstances, he thought it would be much better to postpone the bill. The bill was read a third time and passed.

FE

HOUSE OF COMMONS. Tuesday, June 10. PUNISHMENT OF WHIPPING MALES.] General Thornton moved for leave to bring in a bill to abolish the public whipping of females: he had been more especially led to this by an article which had appeared in the Inverness Journal, which stated, that a woman, young and beautiful, had been whipped in the public streets-that she was in a state of intoxication, seemed quite lost to every sense of her situation, and shortly returned to her old courses. Spectacles such as this were not likely to improve the public morals. The punishment had been partially abolished in England, and he proposed to abolish it entirely, by commuting the punishment for hard labour in a workhouse, for a period not exceeding three months.

The motion was agreed to.

[blocks in formation]

said, he had no intention, in the motion which he was about to submit to the House, to reflect in the slightest degree on those gentlemen who held the situations of commissioners of bankrupts. He knew the numerous difficulties under which they laboured, and he was aware, that, in the circumstances in which they were placed, they performed their duty better than could be expected from them. The evils, however, of the present system were intolerable. In proof of this he referred to the numerously and respectably signed petition which he had presented to the House on the subject, and which conveyed the sense of all the commercial interest of the metropolis, complaining that the place allotted in Guildhall for the business was totally inadequate for the purpose. The crowd and the noise rendered it impossible to enter into a proper investigation of the proof of debts. This might easily be remedied. But the most material evil was, that a system of horrible and scandalous fraud existed in the administration of the Bankrupt Laws-to such a degree, indeed, that of the number of bankruptcies within the last two or three years, half the bankrupts made no dividends at all. Many other grievances he

[ocr errors]

The report of this bill being

would not detail; but they proved the | BILL.]
total inadequacy of the bankrupt laws to brought up,
protect the creditors, and even the bank-
rupt himself. The hon. gentleman then
entered into a detailed history of a pro-
ceeding in a case of bankruptcy, and
dwelt particularly on the difficulty which
assignees experienced in the discharge of
their duty; on the great frauds which oc-
curred in the obtaining of certificates; and
on the want of all distinction between moral
and immoral bankrupts; and concluded
by moving, "That a select committee be
appointed to consider the bankrupt laws,
and of the operation thereof."

Mr. Wrottesley was far from wishing to object to the motion; but he begged to suggest to the hon. gentleman, whether he thought any public advantage could be reaped by entering upon an inquiry into so extensive a subject at so late a period of the session. Might it not be more expedient to move a resolution, that the House would take the matter into consideration early in the next session.

Mr. Serjeant Onslow was persuaded that a Select Committee might make great progress in investigating the subject during the present session; and, certainly, there was no subject which more loudly demanded immediate investigation.

Mr. Grenfell thought, that the best mode of securing the attention of parliament to this important subject, in the next session, would be to appoint a committee, and to proceed in the inquiry, as far as possible, during the present session. The motion was agreed to.

EXTENTS IN AID.] Mr. W. Smith moved for the appointment of a Select Committee to inquire into the subject of Extents in Aid; grounding his motion on the utter insufficiency of the bill introduced by the chancellor of the exchequer, to reach the greater number of the existing evils.

Sir M. W. Ridley seconded the motion, and described a case of great hardship at Durham to prove the evil of extents in aid.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer had no objection to the motion, and declared, that the only object which he and his colleagues had in view on this question was, that of securing the rights of the Crown without doing injustice to the subject.

The motion was agreed to.

CIVIL SERVICES COMPENSATION

Mr. Tierney thought that a compensation ought to be granted to the Crown for those means of rewarding public services of which it would be deprived by the abolition of sinecures: the only question was, as to the mode and amount of such compensations. He would strongly object to that part of the measure which made length of service a criterion of merit. If so, did any body suppose that three years were sufficient to be spent in a cabinet office to entitle the individual to a cabinet pension? Besides what reason was there for making a difference between the period of their service, and that of those who held inferior situations? This measure was spoken of as one of economy; but its economy to the nation would not be considerable. In the first place, it might create a greater expenditure. At the end of two years government would have at its disposal pensions to the amount of 11,000l., while, perhaps, not one of the sinecures would fall in to the public relief. At the end of four years, 18,000l. of pensions might be given away without any proportionate compensation to the country in the abolition of useless places. The whole saving that would accrue to the public at the death of the present holders of the sinecures abolished by the bills before parliament was calculated to amount only to 95,000l., and against that, at the end of 12 years, there might be placed 42,000l. of pensions, granted to the Crown in compensation. This saving might at first sight appear considerable, but it would upon examination be found much less than had now been stated. Besides, it would not be realized for many years: while, during some time to come, the system of pensions would create a positive loss to the country. This bill, with these objections against it, had passed through the House without much opposition, precisely because confidence was placed in that committee from which it originated; and which, from the little attention it bestowed upon the subject of its inquiry, did not deserve any. There was no evidence in the report to show the policy of the measures it recommended, or to point out the saving that would accrue to the public. He could not but regard this measure, therefore, as a gross delusion practised upon the public; from which the country would gain nothing, and whose only re

sult would be, an increase of the national burthens and ministerial patronage. The cabinet would in 4 years have the power of engrossing for their own behoof 9,000l.: and if the ministers had the good fortune to stick to their places for 4 years, they would have at their disposal 18,000l. They made no question about the falling in of sinecures: they only thought of the increase of their patronage. He was of opinion, that no pension should be conferred till the consolidated fund had the benefit of the falling in of an equivalent sinecure salary. The bill, he thought, ought to be sent back to the committee to be amended. He stated these objections; he would ground no motion upon them. A triumphant answer to them might be expected from the noble lord; but he could not disprove figures. He had no reluctance to remunerate meritorious civil officers, but the measure should be carried into effect in a way that, under the pretence of economy and of a saving to the public, should not increase the public burthens or the ministerial patronage.

Lord Castlereagh said, it was rather strange that the right hon. gentleman should have been so long silent, if he really relied on the deductions of his own reasoning; and that he had suffered two bills to pass, and to be carried up to the Lords, without opposition, which were much more objectionable, in every point of view, than the present. The right hon. gentleman had acted unfairly in leaving out the savings that would fall in from the abolition of the offices in Ireland. This was a most important omission when calculating the amount of the future balance to the public from the present measures. The compensation was given in lieu of all the offices, and the right hon. gentleman had compared its amount with the aggregate salaries of only a part. The right hon. gentleman had said, that in two years 11,000l. of pensions would accrue to the Crown from this bill, and in four years 18,000l. This statement he (lord C.) denied. Without including the supernumerary pensions which would be placed at the disposal of the Crown, only 5,500l. would be placed in the power of government at the end of the first two years; and, at the end of four years, only 13,000l. There was no probability that the 42,000l. which was the amount of the pension list created by this bill, would ever be in complete operation at the same time. The discharge of 30,000l. was probably as

|

high as it would go. The right hon. gentleman had, however, taken the pensions at the highest, and the sinecures at the lowest estimate, exaggerating in the one case, and omitting in the other. The noble lord seeing no reason to alter his opinion, would give this measure his full support. He could conceive no other object which the right hon. gentleman had in view, by disgusting the House and the country with the observations he had stated, but to make a speech; as he proposed no amendment, and concluded with no motion. Why did he not oppose the proceeding in the committee? Why did he not state his opinions earlier? or, why did he now state them at all? Had he turned his back on his old friends, and was he prepared to disgust the country by op posing a measure less exceptionable than the one he formerly supported? His opposition, he hoped, would have no effect against the adoption of a measure of undeniable economy; manifesting a sincere desire to meet the reasonable wishes of the people by a great sacrifice of patronage, and an important retrenchment of expenditure.

Mr. Calcraft contended, that by this measure the public would be a gainer by the difference between 100,000l. and 42,000l. besides they would be getting rid of offices odious to the country. Further reductions might also be made in the pension list, which could be applied towards the pensions created by this bill.

The report was then ordered to be brought up. Mr. D. Gilbert moved several clauses, which were agreed to. Mr. Calcraft moved a clause, "That any person who may accept a pension under this act, shall vacate his seat in parliament."

Mr. Canning objected to the clause. The acceptance of a place caused the seat of a member to be vacated, because the member was supposed to be thereby more under the influence of the Crown, and was therefore sent back to his constituents, to determine how far he was still worthy of their confidence; but in the ac ceptance of a pension the case was quite different, for the pension was received on retiring from office, and at a time when the person ceased to be under the influence of government.

Lord Milton contended, that the pensions were a substitution for offices, on re ceiving which members were obliged to vacate their seats.

Mr. Robinson said, the pensions under

[blocks in formation]

On the motion, that the bill be read a third time to-mrrow.

Lord Milton repeated his objections to the principle of the bill, considering it a principle wholly new in the government of this country, and calculated to degrade the character of public men.

Mr. Robinson was surprised that gentlemen should have kept back their constitutional objections to this late stage of the bill. As to any man looking towards this remote pension as a bribe, he did not believe that there would be much competition for such a prize. It must be, as indeed it ought to be, a hopeless speculation in a pecuniary point of view.

the country by the labours of ministers. For his own part, he thought that instances might arise when ministers might do much more good by resigning than by keeping their places. But the paltry temptations of the present bill would tend to keep ministers in till they had carried their pension by length of service. Thus, it was possible to imagine (he was of course merely putting a supposed case), that at some future time there might be

serious divisions in the cabinet on some question of even vital importance, and that some particular minister might be subjected to some disagreeable slight on that account; and such a man might by the present bill, be induced to cling to the office which he would otherwise reject. He might say "Well, this is very unpleasant; but let me wait a little longer, and then I shall have a pension to console these indignities. Meantime, let "bear and forbear" be my maxim:

"Quicquid erit: superanda omnis fortuna ferendo est."

Mr. Hammersley said, that the power of the House of Commons was at an end, if it could not take away any unnecessary and hurtful prerogative from the Crown without supplying an indemnification.

Sir R. Heron thought the bill highly objectionable in the present bankrupt state of the country. He conceived that the Crown had sufficient means of rewarding its servants out of the old pension list; and if the bill should unfortunately survive so long as a third reading, he should move a

rider to that effect.

The House divided:
Yeas
Noes

[ocr errors]

List of the Minority.

Boswell, Alexander
Barnett, James
Calvert, Charles
Carter, John
Duncannon, visc.
Douglas, W. R. K.

Mr. Gordon differed from the right hon. gentleman: he thought that the very limitation of the rewards would excite a keener competition. Any person at all acquainted with commercial speculations knew well, that a great prize or two awakened a keener appetite than many small ones. This bill would, for the first time, make politics a trade; a circumstance the more to be regretted at a moment when the public were not disposed to look with peculiar favour on official men of what-Fergusson, sir R. C. ever party. As to the argument about the necessity of remunerating men who left lucrative professions, he conceived that it would be better if such persons remained in their profession, if gain was their object, and if they could not be contented with the higher honour of being called to assist the sovereign with advice for the benefit of the people. Much had been said about the services rendered to

Gordon, Robt.
Hammersley, H.
Lefevre, C. Shaw
Martin, Henry
Martin, John

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Milton, visc.

25

Newman, R. W.
Newport, sir J.
Neville, hon. R.
Ponsonby, rt. hon. G.

Tierney, rt. hon. G.
Teed, John
Webb, Ed.

[blocks in formation]

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

Wednesday, June 11.

PERSONS IN CONFINEMENT UNDER THE HABEAS CORPUS SUSPENSION BILL.]

« PreviousContinue »