Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Taxation-Mr. Ruthven's Motion, that Taxation should be

Reduced

Church of Scotland-Motion by Mr. Sinclair for leave to bring
in a Bill to abolish Church Patronage in Scotland
July 17. Case of Captain Atchison-Petition-Case of an Officer dis-
missed from the military service for not firing a salute in
honour of a Catholic Religious Festival

Sugar Refining-Tower Hamlets Decay of the Tower

Hamlets, in consequence of the state of the laws as to

Refining Sugar

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Deccan Prize-Money-Questions by Mr. Warburton
East-India Company's Charter-Bill considered in Committee
-Fourth Day

Committee on the Bill-Alterations

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

.. 103

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

23. Highways Bill-Statutory Labour-Bill Committed
Duration of Parliaments-Mr. Tennyson's Motion for leave
to bring in a Bill to shorten the duration of Parliaments-
Division-List, &c.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Ministerial Plan for the Abolition of Slavery-Motion to go
into the Committee-Amendment moved by Mr. F. Buxton,
for an instruction to the Committee to limit the duration of
the restrictions on the Slaves-Divisions-List, &c.
Dramatic Performances-Bill read a third time and passed 1220

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

25. Ministerial Plan for the Abolition of Slavery-Committee-

Second Day

Breach of Privilege-Complaint made by Mr. O'Connell-
Motion that the Proprietor of the "Morning Chronicle" be
called to the Bar-Motion withdrawn

Ministerial Plan for the Abolition of Slavery-House in Com-

mittee third day-Amendments-Divisions, &c.

[ocr errors]

III. LISTS OF DIVISIONS.

[ocr errors]

110

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

8. The Ayes on Mr. Sheil's Motion to insert in the Preamble to
the Church Temporalities (Ireland) Bill, a Declaration, that
the Church Property may be applied as the Legislature
may think beneficial

282

The Ayes on the Question (on the Third Reading of the Scots
Burghs Bill) that El. be inserted instead of 107.

302

[merged small][ocr errors]

11. The Noes on the Question, that an Address be Presented to

his Majesty for a Copy of the Minutes of the Court Martial
on the case of Captain Robison

608

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

HANSARD'S

Parliamentary Debates

During the FIRST SESSION of the ELEVENTHI PARLIAMENT
of the United Kingdom of GREAT BRITAIN and
IRELAND, appointed to meet at Westminster,
29th January, 1833,

in the Third Year of the Reign of His Majesty
WILLIAM THE FOURTH.

Fifth Volume of the Session.

HOUSE OF LORDS,
Tuesday, July 2, 1833.

MINUTES.] Papers ordered. On the Motion of the Duke
of WELLINGTON, an Estimate of the Financial Results
upon the Revenues and Charges of India of the Plan
under Consideration for the future Government of that
Country.

Petitions presented. By Lord WILLOUGHBY DE ERESBY, from the Boston Public Library, for the Repeal of the Taxes on Knowledge.-By Lord SUFFIELD, from Kingston-upon-Hull, for a Negotiation with France and other Powers for the Benefit of Poland,

HOUSE OF COMMONS,
Tuesday, July 2, 1833.

MINUTES.] Papers ordered. On the Motion of Mr. RONAYNE,
a Copy of Instructions sent by Mr. Kemmiss to Mr. Gun
relative to his Proceedings for the Collection of Tithes in
the County of Tipperary.-On the Motion of Mr. ROBERT
WALLACE, the Names and Designations of the Persons
forming the Commission of Inquiry into the State of the
Laws and Judicatories in Scotland, with the Instructions
given to them, and the Amount of Remuneration they
are to receive.-On the Motion of Mr. PEASE, the Names

SANDON, from the Medical Practitioners of Liverpool, and Mr. RONAYNE, from an Individual, against the Apothecaries Act.-By Mr. Bowes, from Barnard Castle, against the proposed Alteration in the Bank Charter.--By Mr. HARDY, from the Chairman of a Meeting of Overlookers of Mills and Factories of Bradford (York); and by Mr. HODGSON, from Newcastle-upon-Tyne,-in favour of the Factories Regulation Bill,-By Mr. AysнFORD SANFORD, from several Places, against the Tithes Commutation Bill.-By Major KEPPEL, from Henstead, Norfolk, for the Repeal of the Tax on Carts.-By Mr. GROTE, from London, Lord SANDON, from Liverpool, and Mr. HODGSON, from Sunderland, against the Notaries Public Bill.-By Sir ANDREW AGNEW, from a Number of Places, in favour of the Lord's Day Observance Bill.By Mr. HAWKINS, from Newport, Isle of Wight, for the Repeal of the Septennial Act.-By Mr. HYETT, from Stroud, against the Rating of Tenements Bill.-By Mr. ABERCROMBIE, from Edinburgh, in favour of the Royal Burgh (Scotland) Bill; from the Royal College of Physicians of that Town, against the Apothecaries Bill; from the Magistrates and Town Council of the same, for an additional Duty on Spirits; from the Chamber of Commerce of the same, for the Abolition of the Duty on Stamped Receipts; from a Wesleyan Congregation, for the Abolition of Slavery; from Stranraer, for an Alteration in the Reform of Parliament (Scotland) Bill.

of Commissioners appointed, and now officiating for the OPORTO TRADE.] Mr. Grote pre

issue of Exchequer-bills for Public Works in England:
Accounts of the yearly Expenses of the said Commis-
sioners, for each year, since 1831, and of the Amount of
Exchequer-bills issued by them.-On the Motion of Mr.
E. RUTHVEN, an Account of all Persons on the Sheriffs
Paper as Jurors in the County of Kildare, who were
Fined within the last Twelve Months.
Bill. Read a third time:-Drainage Rates Recovery.
Petitions presented. By Sir ROBERT INGLIS, from the
Medical Practitioners of York, against the Apothecaries

Bill.—By Mr. WYNDHAM, from several Places, against from a Congregation of Independents at Lymington, against Slavery.—By the Sheriffs of London and Middlesex

the Tithes Commutation Bill.-By Lord PALMERSTON,

from the City of London, for the Repeal of the Septennial
Act. By Mr. HUME, from a Number against the present
System of Church Patronage in Scotland.-By Lord
VOL. XIX. Third
Series f

sented a Petition from the Merchants of London, trading with Oporto, complaining of the great loss which they had already sustained, and the injury to which they were continually exposed in consequence of the continued struggle existing for the last ten months in Portugal. The complainants stated, that they and other English merchants were in the habit of making large purchases of wine, which were deposited in Villa Nova, on the south side of the Douro, and consequently ex

B

ment had determined to pursue; at the same time, occasions might arise in which it would be imperative on the Government to interfere in defending British subjects. It was true, that by the treaties between the two countries, even in case of war between England and Portugal, the subjects of this realm would have a right to remove their persons and their property without molestation; and, therefore, it did appear to him they were doubly entitled to that facility in the time of peace. It was not on the part of the merchants that any difficulty arose, the existing difficulties arose on the part of the government of Don Miguel. They were still in communication with that government, and, therefore, he was anxious that an arrangement should be made which would be satisfactory to all parties. He could not help declaring his opinion that the manner in which that warfare had been

posed to the chances of war from the batteries on each side of the river, and the other operations between the contending parties. The House was, perhaps, not aware that English property, to the amount of 1,000,000l. sterling, was exposed in that manner. The solvency, if not the very existence, of the petitioners depended on some decided steps being taken by the Government. Their property to a great extent was injured by the cannon-balls, and the bursting of shells among their wine magazines. They had been anxious to get their wines shipped to this country, but from difficulties and delay interposed by the government of Don Miguel, it had been found impracticable; and they now intreated the sympathy and support of the House, for the purpose of making some vigorous efforts to rescue their property from its present hazardous and ruinous state. They did not in any degree complain of the conduct of his Majesty's Go-carried on by the army of Don Miguel vernment, but this injury and this distress still impelled them to seek their assistance in the immediate liberation of their property. The petitioners had done everything they could, to effect the removal of the difficulties which had opposed the exportation of the wines; they had even offered the payment of double duties to the contending parties, but they were defeated in their efforts. He begged to recommend the prayer of the petition to the serious consideration and sympathy of his Majesty's Government.

Mr. Robinson supported the prayer of the petition. The Newfoundland trade would be seriously affected in consequence of the shutting up of the port of Oporto. The very existence of the parties concerned in that trade depended upon the ports of Portugal being accessible to their produce. He made no charge against the Government; on the contrary, he believed that all persons connected with the trade of Portugal were perfectly satisfied with the steps the Government had taken, and that it had been anxious to do justice.

Viscount Palmerston could assure the House that this petition should not escape the attention of the Government, and he was much obliged to the hon. Gentleman who had just sat down for doing justice to the anxiety the Government had felt to do justice to the petitioners, but there was some little difficulty in interfering in this matter, without appearing to depart from that line of neutrality which the Govern

against Oporto was unprecedented in the history of civilized countries. He could only say, Government had declared to the authorities of Don Miguel that they would hold Portugal responsible for all damage done to British property in consequence of Don Miguel's refusal to let it be withdrawn from Oporto.

Petition to lie on the Table.

REDEMPTION OF THE NATIONAL DEBT.] Mr. Buckingham said, that in drawing the attention of the House to the subject of his Motion, he was fully aware of the disadvantages under which he laboured, in having to address so small a number of Members (there being about 100 only present), more especially as expectations had been raised that another subject--that of triennial Parliaments, would have been presented to them; and their disappointment at its necessary postponement, might, in some degree, indispose them to hear any other topic with equal readiness or attention. Notwithstanding this, he hoped that before he resumed his seat, he should be able to convince them that there was no subject of greater importance to the whole community, than that to which he would immediately address himself: and that there was no time more favourable than the present for entering on its consideration. He asked only their patient attention for a reasonable portion of time; and he would evince his sense of its value, by

« PreviousContinue »