Page images
PDF
EPUB

MICHAEL ANGELO AND POPE JULIUS II. VIEWING

THE APOLLO BELVIDERE.

After the Painting by C. Becker.

HE Apollo Belvidere was dug up near Antium at the close of the fifteenth century. Pope Julius II., who had purchased it when a cardinal, allowed Michael Angelo to place it in the Belvidere of the Vatican, where it stood until the French removed it in 1797. It was restored in 1815. The statue is supposed to be a copy from a Greek original now lost. Becker's painting shows the Pope and his Court which included Michael Angelo and Raphael inspecting the statue after it had been placed on its pedestal.

[graphic]

form, at the same time, the "Last Judgment" on the wall of the Sistine Chapel, the glorious dome of St. Peter's, and the group of "Notre Dame de Pitié," which now adorns the chapel of the Crucifix, under the roof of that august edifice. The "Holy Family" in the Palazzo Pitti at Florence, and the "Three Fates" in the same collection, give an idea of his powers in oil painting; thus he carried to the highest perfection, at the same time, the rival arts of architecture, sculpture, fresco, and oil painting. He may truly be called the founder of Italian painting, as Homer was of the ancient epic, and Dante of the great style in modern poetry. None but a colossal mind could have done such things. Raphael took lessons from him in painting, and professed through life the most unbounded respect for his great preceptor. None have attempted to approach him in architecture; the cupola of St. Peter's stands alone in the world.

But notwithstanding all this, Michael Angelo had some defects. He created the great style in painting, a style which has made modern Italy as immortal as the arms of the legions did the ancient. But the very grandeur of his conceptions, the vigor of his drawing, his incomparable command of bone and muscle, his lofty expression and impassioned mind, made him neglect, and perhaps despise, the lesser details of his art. Ardent in the pursuit of expression, he often overlooked execution. When he painted the "Last Judgment" or the "Fall of the Titans" in fresco, on the ceiling and walls of the Sistine Chapel, he was incomparable; but that gigantic style was unsuitable for lesser pictures or rooms of ordinary proportions. By the study of his masterpieces, subsequent painters have often been led astray; they have aimed at force of expression to the neglect of delicacy in execution. This defect is, in an especial manner, conspicuous in Sir Joshua Reynolds, who worshiped Michael Angelo with the most devoted fervor; and through him it has descended to Lawrence, and nearly the whole modern school of England. When we see Sir Joshua's noble glass window in Magdalen College, Oxford, we behold the work of a worthy pupil of Michael Angelo; we see the great style of painting in its proper place, and applied to its appropri ate object: but when we compare his portraits, or imaginary pieces, in oil, with those of Titian, Velasquez, or Vandyke, the inferiority is manifest. It is not in the design, but the finishing; not in the conception, but the execution. The colors are frequently raw and harsh; the details or distant parts of the piece

« PreviousContinue »