Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of California, Volume 76Bancroft-Whitney, 1906 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 4
... question arising in this case . He is not bound to do so . He is authorized to rely upon the acknowledg- ment of the treasurer in the one case , just as he is author- ized to rely upon the receipt of that officer in the other . In each ...
... question arising in this case . He is not bound to do so . He is authorized to rely upon the acknowledg- ment of the treasurer in the one case , just as he is author- ized to rely upon the receipt of that officer in the other . In each ...
Page 5
... question , the certificate of the auditor , which contained an express statement that he then had in his hands , to be at once paid into the treasury , the amount in question ; and he acted upon this statement by depositing it in the ...
... question , the certificate of the auditor , which contained an express statement that he then had in his hands , to be at once paid into the treasury , the amount in question ; and he acted upon this statement by depositing it in the ...
Page 7
... question presented here is , whether the release of Forman relinquished the obligation of plaintiff . The code provides that " a release of one of two or more joint debtors does not extinguish the obligation of any of the others unless ...
... question presented here is , whether the release of Forman relinquished the obligation of plaintiff . The code provides that " a release of one of two or more joint debtors does not extinguish the obligation of any of the others unless ...
Page 8
... question . APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County , and from an order refusing a new trial The facts are stated in the opinion . W. D. Tupper , for Appellant . Brown & Daggett , for Respondents . BELCHER , C. C. ...
... question . APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County , and from an order refusing a new trial The facts are stated in the opinion . W. D. Tupper , for Appellant . Brown & Daggett , for Respondents . BELCHER , C. C. ...
Page 15
... questions involved in this appeal have recently been determined adversely to the con- tentions of appellate herein . It is therefore unnecessary to notice them further ... question is not whether April , 1888. ] 15 HEILBRON v . CANAL Co.
... questions involved in this appeal have recently been determined adversely to the con- tentions of appellate herein . It is therefore unnecessary to notice them further ... question is not whether April , 1888. ] 15 HEILBRON v . CANAL Co.
Contents
318 | |
355 | |
386 | |
387 | |
394 | |
395 | |
404 | |
460 | |
116 | |
125 | |
131 | |
136 | |
169 | |
230 | |
242 | |
255 | |
281 | |
291 | |
294 | |
305 | |
469 | |
494 | |
508 | |
521 | |
567 | |
578 | |
587 | |
618 | |
626 | |
631 | |
659 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action was brought adverse possession affidavit affirmed agreement alleged amended appeal Appellant application assessment attorney auditor bill of exceptions cause of action city and county Civil Code Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred contract corporation counsel county of San damages deed defendant defendant's demurrer effect entitled error estoppel evidence facts favor fendant filed grant held homestead hundred dollars insured issued judge judgment and order jury Kings River land lien mandamus MCFARLAND MCKINSTRY ment mortgage motion Note citations notice opinion order denying order refusing owner paid parties payment person plaintiff possession premises purchase quantum meruit question railroad real property recover Respondent San Francisco SEARLS SHARPSTEIN sheriff statement statute statute of limitations street sufficient Superior Court sustaining thereof thousand dollars tiff tion tract trial void writ