Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of California, Volume 76Bancroft-Whitney, 1906 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 89
Page 10
... answered by the decision lately rendered in Heilbron v . Fowler Switch Canal Co. , 75 Cal . 426 . The appeal from the judgment should be dismissed , and , on the authority of the last - named case , the order denying a new trial should ...
... answered by the decision lately rendered in Heilbron v . Fowler Switch Canal Co. , 75 Cal . 426 . The appeal from the judgment should be dismissed , and , on the authority of the last - named case , the order denying a new trial should ...
Page 11
... ANSWER - DISCRETION . - It is not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to refuse to allow an amended answer to be filed , when the matters set out therein are not substantially different from those already pleaded in the answer on ...
... ANSWER - DISCRETION . - It is not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to refuse to allow an amended answer to be filed , when the matters set out therein are not substantially different from those already pleaded in the answer on ...
Page 14
... answer to the amended complaint and cross - complaint . " A demurrer was in- terposed to the so - called cross - complaint , which was sus- tained by the court . The answer and cross - complaint set up an alleged appropriation of the ...
... answer to the amended complaint and cross - complaint . " A demurrer was in- terposed to the so - called cross - complaint , which was sus- tained by the court . The answer and cross - complaint set up an alleged appropriation of the ...
Page 15
... answer were not substantially different from those which had already been pleaded in the answer on file . The court denied the motion , on the ground " that said matters of amendment are sufficiently pleaded in the original answer to ...
... answer were not substantially different from those which had already been pleaded in the answer on file . The court denied the motion , on the ground " that said matters of amendment are sufficiently pleaded in the original answer to ...
Page 45
... answer denied all the allegations of the complaint with respect to a partnership between the plaintiff and the defendant , and averred that the purchase of the interest of the estate of Armstrong was made by the defendant for his own ...
... answer denied all the allegations of the complaint with respect to a partnership between the plaintiff and the defendant , and averred that the purchase of the interest of the estate of Armstrong was made by the defendant for his own ...
Contents
318 | |
355 | |
386 | |
387 | |
394 | |
395 | |
404 | |
460 | |
116 | |
125 | |
131 | |
136 | |
169 | |
230 | |
242 | |
255 | |
281 | |
291 | |
294 | |
305 | |
469 | |
494 | |
508 | |
521 | |
567 | |
578 | |
587 | |
618 | |
626 | |
631 | |
659 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action was brought adverse possession affidavit affirmed agreement alleged amended appeal Appellant application assessment attorney auditor bill of exceptions cause of action city and county Civil Code Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred contract corporation counsel county of San damages deed defendant defendant's demurrer effect entitled error estoppel evidence facts favor fendant filed grant held homestead hundred dollars insured issued judge judgment and order jury Kings River land lien mandamus MCFARLAND MCKINSTRY ment mortgage motion Note citations notice opinion order denying order refusing owner paid parties payment person plaintiff possession premises purchase quantum meruit question railroad real property recover Respondent San Francisco SEARLS SHARPSTEIN sheriff statement statute statute of limitations street sufficient Superior Court sustaining thereof thousand dollars tiff tion tract trial void writ