Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of California, Volume 76Bancroft-Whitney, 1906 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 70
Page 9
... March , 1887. As more than a year elapsed between the entry and the appeal , the appeal from the judgment cannot be considered , and must be dismissed . It is claimed for the appellant that the demurrer to the complaint should have been ...
... March , 1887. As more than a year elapsed between the entry and the appeal , the appeal from the judgment cannot be considered , and must be dismissed . It is claimed for the appellant that the demurrer to the complaint should have been ...
Page 18
... March 11 , 1858. The defendants pleaded in bar of the action a judg- ment rendered in favor of Holladay , in an action brought by him against the city and county , on the 17th of December , 1864 , to quiet his title , in which it was ...
... March 11 , 1858. The defendants pleaded in bar of the action a judg- ment rendered in favor of Holladay , in an action brought by him against the city and county , on the 17th of December , 1864 , to quiet his title , in which it was ...
Page 19
... March 11 , 1868. The defendants claimed to be entitled to the land , under the provisions of the Van Ness Ordinance , and pleaded certain judgments in bar of the action . The provisions of the ordinance under which the defendants ...
... March 11 , 1868. The defendants claimed to be entitled to the land , under the provisions of the Van Ness Ordinance , and pleaded certain judgments in bar of the action . The provisions of the ordinance under which the defendants ...
Page 20
... March 11 , 1858 ( Stats . 1858 , p . 52 ) . A digest of the provisions of the Van Ness ordinance and other ordinances of the city , mentioned in the act of the legislature referred to , is given in the report of Hoadley v . San ...
... March 11 , 1858 ( Stats . 1858 , p . 52 ) . A digest of the provisions of the Van Ness ordinance and other ordinances of the city , mentioned in the act of the legislature referred to , is given in the report of Hoadley v . San ...
Page 61
... March , 114 U. S. 550 ; 1 Wharton on Contracts , secs . 593-596 . ) The plaintiff was not entitled to interest before judgment . ( Osborn v . Hendrickson , 8 Cal . 31 ; Aldrich v . Durham , 16 Ill . 403 ; Illinois Cent . R. R. Co. v ...
... March , 114 U. S. 550 ; 1 Wharton on Contracts , secs . 593-596 . ) The plaintiff was not entitled to interest before judgment . ( Osborn v . Hendrickson , 8 Cal . 31 ; Aldrich v . Durham , 16 Ill . 403 ; Illinois Cent . R. R. Co. v ...
Contents
318 | |
355 | |
386 | |
387 | |
394 | |
395 | |
404 | |
460 | |
116 | |
125 | |
131 | |
136 | |
169 | |
230 | |
242 | |
255 | |
281 | |
291 | |
294 | |
305 | |
469 | |
494 | |
508 | |
521 | |
567 | |
578 | |
587 | |
618 | |
626 | |
631 | |
659 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action was brought adverse possession affidavit affirmed agreement alleged amended appeal Appellant application assessment attorney auditor bill of exceptions cause of action city and county Civil Code Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred contract corporation counsel county of San damages deed defendant defendant's demurrer effect entitled error estoppel evidence facts favor fendant filed grant held homestead hundred dollars insured issued judge judgment and order jury Kings River land lien mandamus MCFARLAND MCKINSTRY ment mortgage motion Note citations notice opinion order denying order refusing owner paid parties payment person plaintiff possession premises purchase quantum meruit question railroad real property recover Respondent San Francisco SEARLS SHARPSTEIN sheriff statement statute statute of limitations street sufficient Superior Court sustaining thereof thousand dollars tiff tion tract trial void writ