 |
|
From inside the bookTry this search over all volumes: ment What people are saying - Write a reviewReview: The Five Types of Legal ArgumentUser Review - John Yelverton - GoodreadsThe five different ways that you can do exactly what we tell you to do. Yeah, this book was awful. Read full review Review: The Five Types of Legal ArgumentUser Review - Rex - GoodreadsThis is perhaps the most helpful book I've read in law school. It classifies legal arguments into five basic categories and briefly explains how each type of argument is used and how to attack each ... Read full review Related books
Contents
16 other sections not shown Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrasesAkhil Amar Amendment analogy argu attorney balancing bank Bobbitt Bork Brandeis cable canons of construction Chapter Clause communication competing conflict between text Congress consequentialist contract cross-type conflict decision determine dissenting doctrine drafters Eskridge evidence example facts factual federal courts five types framers Frickey H.L.A. Hart interpretation Intra-type Attacks intratextual arguments Jacob & Youngs judges Justice Breyer Justice Kennedy Justice Scalia Langdell language legal argument legal realism Legal Reasoning legal scholars legal text legislative history legislative intent legislature Marbury Marshall ment Oliver Wendell Holmes Philip Bobbitt plain meaning plain meaning rule policy analysis policy arguments precedent principles purpose question realist Richard Posner Robert Bork rule of law rule of lenity section 632 sexual conduct social stare decisis statute statutory supra note Supreme Court T]he text and intent textual theory tion tradition type of argument types of legal underlying Uniform Commercial Code United words Bibliographic information
|