Reviews

User reviews

Review: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning

User Review - David Hine - Goodreads

I'd probably appreciate it more if I completely understood it. A good overview of how a body of law expands and changes in constitutional, case law, and statutory contexts. I intend to re-read it soon. Read full review

Review: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning

User Review - Chris - Goodreads

a short, knotty little book. he sketches the dialectical movement of case law, statutory interpretation, and constitutional law in history. Read full review

Review: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning

User Review - C. Web. - Goodreads

Levi really simplifies the "science of legal reasoning" in a nice easy to remember mantra of "reasoning by example". He tracks the development of case law, statutory interpretation, and constitutional ... Read full review

Review: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning

User Review - bryan - Goodreads

Flat textbook writing at its most mind-numbing. Don't be fooled by those who say you "must" read it before law school. If you're starting law school in the fall and want a head start, get John Delaney's Learning Legal Reasoning. Read full review

Review: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning

User Review - Craig Cunningham - Goodreads

I love this book. The book reminds me of my first days in law school, because this is one of the first texts we used for required reading. However, the book harkens nostalgia for me, but it remains a ... Read full review

Review: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning

User Review - Shaze81 - Goodreads

This is a very difficult book to read. It requires complete concentration. Read full review

Review: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning

User Review - jon - Goodreads

Discusses the way lawyers reason. A good book for any lawyer. Read full review

Review: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning

User Review - Patrick A. - Goodreads

This book is a must-read prior to law school. Read full review

Review: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning

User Review - Thomas - Goodreads

concise & interesting. showed me how today's arguments for constitutional originalism fall flat even to a book first written 50+ years ago. Read full review